4. OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE TO VICTIMS OF CRIME
Here is the list of the OBSTRUCTIONS, I have faced, since May 2009.
1. The lawyers refused to provide me with the legal service I needed to file legal action against my offender. If the lawyers fail to provide legal service to the victims of crime, they cannot bring their offenders to Justice; therefore, it is impossible to prevent crime.
2. The Law Society failed to investigate the issue. The Executive Director of the Law Society, Timothy E. McGee stated that the lawyers have no obligation to provide legal service to the victims of crime. If the Law Society fails to enforce the rules of professional conduct, the lawyers may only provide legal service to the persons they like, and legal service may not be available for everyone.
 3. Justice Nathan H. Smith dismissed my legal action against Timothy E. McGee with costs and refused to sign his order, in compliance with the procedural norms. If the members of the judiciary fail to enforce the Law to ensure that legal services are available for everyone - including the victims of crime - victims of crime cannot bring their offenders to Justice; therefore, it is impossible to prevent crime.
4. Legal representative of Timothy E. McGee, Michael G. Armstrong, attempted to exact the court costs based on the unsigned - INVALID - court order. If the members of the Law Society have no hesitation to swindle money from the victims of crime, using unsigned court orders, it impossible to trust the members of the Law Society.
5. The Chief Justice, Christopher E. Hinkson, refused to investigate my complaint regarding the enforcement of INVALID court orders. If the Chief Justice turns blind eye to the legal chicaneries perpetrated under his supervision, it is impossible to prevent corruption in the Court Services
6.  Justice Austin F. Cullen dismissed my legal action against the Chief Justice, without referring to any authority that relaxes the Chief Justice’s DUTY to investigate unusual practice of Law in the Courts. Therefore, he refused to sign his order, in compliance with the procedural norms. An Honourable Justice cannot be associated with dismissing the legal action of a victim of crime, without adjudicating the issue before the Court, and refusing to sign the dismissal order, in compliance with the procedural norms.  
7. Justice Janice R. Dillon dismissed my legal action against Austin F. Cullen and declared me “vexatious litigant”. If a member of the judiciary dismisses the legal action of a victim of crime who is struggling to bring his offender to Justice and declares him “VEXATIOUS LITIGANT”, obviously, her status is NOT any better than the CRIMINAL WHO OFFENDED THE VICTIM.
8. The Chief Justice, issued a court order stating that no person has obligation to respond to my civil claim against Janice R. Dillon and he refused to sign his order, despite my numerous requests. THAT IS: You have disregarded my RIGHT and DUTY to bring my offender to Justice and OBSTRUCTED my access to the Court Services.

5. DUTY TO INFORM THE PUBLIC
If a victim of crime is not permitted to discharge his DUTY to bring his offender to JUSTICE, the victim must blow the whistle; otherwise, it is impossible to prevent crime and corruption in the Court Services. Therefore, my present DUTY is to PUBLICIZE this legal chicanery, to PREVENT HARM TO THE PUBLIC.
 
6. CONSEQUENCES OF IGNORING THE WRONG
It is prudent to CORRECT THE WRONG on sight; otherwise, it multiplies quickly and may get out of control.
 
 
ethicsfirst015001.gif
Next